Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositório Científi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

O papel da pressão positiva durante a broncofibroscopia: ventilação não invasiva vs válvula de pressão positiva contínua

Authors: Pinto, Tiago;

O papel da pressão positiva durante a broncofibroscopia: ventilação não invasiva vs válvula de pressão positiva contínua

Abstract

Introdução: A realização de broncofibroscopia (BF) a doentes com insuficiência Respiratória grave tem riscos e muitas vezes está contra-indicada. A aplicação de ventilação mecânica não invasiva (VMNI) para assistir a ventilação espontânea durante a BF pode ser constituir uma boa alternativa . Objectivo: Comparar a utilização de VMNI e do CPAP Boussignac (CB), durante a BF, em doentes hipoxémicos e/ou hipercápnicos. Materiais e Metodos: 9 pacientes (1feminino) com hipoxemia definida por PaO2/FiO2<200 com necessidade de (BF) foram elegíveis para o estudo. Cinco indivíduos foram randomizados para o grupo VMNI (G1) e 4 para o grupo CB (G2). Resultados: A pressão parcial arterial de oxigénio (PaO2) melhorou no grupo total: 65,9 (21,9) vs de 94,4 (75,9) pós BF, p=0,03, assim como a relação PaO2/FiO2: 131,7 (129,0) e 150,7 (161, 3), pós BF, p=0,04. A saturação periférica de O2 média durante a BF não foi significativamente diferente comparando os dois grupos: 96,1 (6,9) no G1 vs 97,3 (0,3) no G2, (p=0,62). No G1, 1 paciente foi intubado. Conclusão: Estes resultados sugerem que a pressão positiva tem um papel importante como técnica coadjuvante da BF em pacientes hipoxémicos graves (PaO2/FiO2<200). Neste estudo preliminar nenhuma vantagem da VMNI vs CB.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

Broncofibroscopia, Ventilação mecânica não invasiva, Fiberoptic bronchoscopy, Noninvasive mechanical ventilation, Severe hypoxemia, CPAP boussignac, Hipoxémia grave

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 10
    download downloads 25
  • 10
    views
    25
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
10
25
Green
Related to Research communities