Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://ciencia.ucp....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://ciencia.ucp.pt/en/publ...
Other literature type . 2017
License: unspecified
Data sources: Ciência-UCP
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ciência-UCP
Conference object . 2017
Data sources: Ciência-UCP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Systematic literature review

assessment of pain
Authors: Ribeiro, L.; Capelas, Manuel Luís; Bárrios, Helena;

Systematic literature review

Abstract

Background: Pain control is a priority in palliative care.Intensity is one of the major elements in pain assessment,and should be evaluated through scales, which enhance itsobjectivity. The knowledge and adequate use of the existinginstruments for pain evaluation is essential.Aim: Identification of valid and reliable pain assessmentinstruments.Methods: A systematic literature review was undertaken, onPubmed® database. Papers published on the period between2000 and 2015, written in English, French, Spanish andPortuguese were included. Results: 3217 articles were identified, after exclusion andinclusion criteria and abstract review, 103 papers wereselected for full text analysis. 16 different pain assessmentinstruments were identified and characterized. Heterogeneityin pain assessment scales was found, and these could bebroadly divided in: one-dimensional instruments, multi-dimensional and quality of life scales.Discussion: An absence of consensus regarding painevaluation scales was identified. The lack of standardizationof assessment tools renders the comparison of efficacy andeffectiveness of pain controlling interventions particularlydifficult. However, it was possible to make an extensive surveyof pain assessment scales, identifying the psychometriccharacteristics of each of the identified scales, country, andtype of study, context, target population and number ofcitations.This study confirms the need for standardization of painassessment scales, by the health services, in compliance withthe World Health Organization recommendations for PalliativeCare.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 11
    download downloads 11
  • 11
    views
    11
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
11
11
Green
Related to Research communities