Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista de Saúde Púb...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista de Saúde Pública
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC BY
Data sources: Ciência-UCP
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Peer feedback

online model for developing metacognitive skills in students
Authors: Pereira, António; Araújo, Beatriz; Matias Alves, José; Pereira, Diogo; Príncipe, Fernanda;
Abstract

ntroduction: The Higher Education Institutions face a substantial change in a context in rapid and constant evolution. The challenges to answer to the new expectations in higher education arise for an investigation into the influence of the complex contexts in academic practices, and the assessment of students. Areas that will have to be rethought and renewed (Boud D et al, 2010). The involvement of students in assessment processes means that they do not identify evaluation only as a method of measuring learning, but also to provide learning (Cartney, 2010). Objective: Based on a new paradigm of teaching, student-centered learning and assessment, our objective is to develop metacognitive competencies in higher education students by using peer feedback as a collaborative learning and assessment strategy. Methods: The methodology used is based in the participatory action research, combining qualitative and quantitative approach. Through the use of an online platform (AC3Enf), using the peer feedback strategy, we develop higher education students, metacognitive competencies, such as: self-directed learning, critical and reflective spirit, ability to analyze situations and solve problems, communication skills, leadership, innovation, integration/inter action in a team, adapt to change and decision making. Results: The results of using peer feedback in a online plat form, show us, that students are more critical and reflective thinkers, self awareness, with collaborative behavior, decision making and self-development with innovation and creativity.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

Peer feedback, Higher education, Metacognitive competencies, Decision making

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 36
    download downloads 61
  • 36
    views
    61
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
36
61
Green
gold