Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositório Instituc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Locus de controlo e autoconceito na toxicodependência

Authors: Veiga, Sónia Cristina Gomes;

Locus de controlo e autoconceito na toxicodependência

Abstract

Este estudo tem como finalidade estudar as diferenças entre toxicodependentes em comunidade terapêutica e toxicodependentes em reinserção social relativamente ao Locus de Controlo de Saúde e ao Autoconceito, com recurso a uma amostra de 60 toxicodependentes abstinentes, recolhida no Centro de Solidariedade de Braga – Projeto Homem. Trata-se de um estudo inter-sujeitos e transversal. Os instrumentos utilizados foram: o Questionário Sócio - Demográfico para a caracterização da amostra, a Escala de Locus de Controlo de Saúde (LCS) para avaliar o locus de controlo e o Inventário Clínico de Auto – Conceito (ICAC) para avaliar o autoconceito. Os resultados obtidos no presente estudo revelam uma associação positiva entre a recaída e a dimensão internalidade de Locus de Controlo de Saúde, sendo um resultado muito importante. Não se encontrou diferenças significativas entre os grupos relativamente aos Locus de Controlo de Saúde, no entanto pela análise das médias os dois grupos tendiam a ser mais internos. Relativamente ao autoconceito, houve diferenças entre os grupos, sendo que o grupo de toxicodependentes da comunidade terapêutica, apresentam menor rejeição social, maturidade psicologia e autoeficácia e o grupo de toxicodependentes de reinserção social apresentam maior rejeição social, autoeficácia e maturidade psicológica. Relativamente à impulsividade não se encontraram diferenças significativas entre os grupos.

This study is intended to study the differences between drug addicts in terapeutic community and drug addicts in social reinstatement in relatively to Locus de Controlo de Saúde and of Autoconceito, using a sample of 60 abstinent drug addicts, collected at the Centro de Solidariedade de Braga – Projeto Homem. This is a transversal and inter-subject's study. The instruments used were: the Socio - Demographic Questionnaire to characterize the sample, the scale of the Health Locus of Control (LCS) to assess the locus of control and the Clinical Inventory of Self - Concept (ICAC) to evaluate the self-concept. The results of this study show a positive association between relapse and the internality dimension of the Health Locus of Control, being a very important result. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to the Locus Control Health, however the means for examining the two groups tended to be more internal. Relatively the self-concept, there were differences between groups, and the group of drug addicts in the therapeutic community, present minor social rejection, psychological maturity and self-efficacy and group of social reintegration of drug addicts exhibit higher social rejection, self-efficacy and psychological maturity. Relatively to impulsivity, no significant differences were found between groups.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 50
    download downloads 82
  • 50
    views
    82
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
50
82
Green
Related to Research communities