Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10400.1/3899 , 10400.1/5244
The importance of a priori check of the existence of unit roots in the panel data comes from the already known effect that the presence of unit roots in time series may cause a misinterpretation of estimated results. Adding the cross-section dimension to the time series dimension offers an advantage in testing for nonstationary and cointegration since cross-section increases the data set used in those tests, thus improving their power. However, the cross-section dimension also brings some new problems into question, namely the existence of cross-section dependency which can bias usual panel data unit root test results in small samples. This paper presents a survey of panel unit root tests, evidencing the most recent developments on the issue, including those that account for the presence of contemporaneous cross-correlation as well as for the presence of heterogeneous serial correlation. Parallel to the developments of panel unit root tests, great attention has also been given to cointegration tests. We briefly review the most widely referred cointegration tests. We apply the reviewed panel unit root tests on an EU social variable which represents the population weight over than 65 years of age. We consider data running from 1970 to 2001. The panel unit root test results reveal to be sensitive to the prior assumptions regarding contemporaneous cross-correlation and heterogeneous serial correlation in small samples. The usual battery of panel unit root tests appear not to be adequate when a panel is composed by a mix of a stationary and nonstationary time series.
Estacionaridade, Testes de Raízes Unitárias, Testes em painel com e sem dependência seccional, Dados de painel, Modelos em Painel, Testes às raízes unitárias
Estacionaridade, Testes de Raízes Unitárias, Testes em painel com e sem dependência seccional, Dados de painel, Modelos em Painel, Testes às raízes unitárias
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 76 | |
| downloads | 54 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts