
The objectives of this investigation were: (1) to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of metal, ceramic, and plastic brackets using different concentrations of maleic and phosphoric acid gels and aqueous solutions, and (2) to determine if a relationship exists between the type of acid etchant and the location of resin after debonding. A sample of 210 bovine incisors was divided among three different bracket groups (Victory series metal, Transcend 6000 ceramic, Spirit MB plastic). Prior to bonding, enamel was acid-etched using 37% phosphoric acid (H3PO4) gel and aqueous solution, 10% maleic acid gel and aqueous solution, 10% H3PO4 gel and aqueous solution, or 2% H3PO4 aqueous solution. SBS testing and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score provided insight into the effects of the bonding process on enamel. Resin tags associated with each etchant type were inspected under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analyses (level of significance, p = 0.05) of the data showed significant differences among groups. It was concluded that specific acid-composite-bracket combinations are recommended for use in clinical orthodontic practice in order to achieve efficient bonding.
Ceramics, Dental Debonding, Orthodontic Brackets, Dental Bonding, Maleates, Composite Resins, Incisor, Solutions, Acid Etching, Dental, Adhesives, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Cattle, Phosphoric Acids, Stress, Mechanical, Dental Enamel, Gels, Plastics, Dental Alloys
Ceramics, Dental Debonding, Orthodontic Brackets, Dental Bonding, Maleates, Composite Resins, Incisor, Solutions, Acid Etching, Dental, Adhesives, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Cattle, Phosphoric Acids, Stress, Mechanical, Dental Enamel, Gels, Plastics, Dental Alloys
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
