
handle: 10366/150877
[ES] La hiperconectividad de las sociedades tecnol?gicamente avanzadas expone a numerosas personas y actividades a un elevado n?mero de riesgos digitales. As?, los ciberdelitos hoy en d?a son frecuentes. A grandes rasgos, sus perpetradores aprovechan las vulnerabilidades t?cnicas y humanas para causar estragos en la operatividad de los sistemas inform?ticos y llegar a lucrarse con ello, afectar a la privacidad de los ciudadanos y finalmente da?ar a los intereses generales y la estabilidad institucional. En este escenario, la prueba electr?nica juega un papel decisivo para evitar la impunidad de sus autores, que ya de por s? aprovechan las ventajas derivadas del anonimato y las incertidumbres legales en relaci?n a la competencia judicial, que persisten aunque se haya articulado un cuerpo de normativa internacional. Para superar las deficiencias anteriores, la Ley Org?nica 13/2015, de 5 de octubre, ha supuesto un hito en la regulaci?n de las diligencias de investigaci?n en Espa?a, concretamente de los registros de equipos de almacenamiento masivo de informaci?n y los registros remotos de equipos inform?ticos, entre otros aspectos, estableciendo una regulaci?n m?s garantista con la preservaci?n de los Derechos Fundamentales, pero con limitaciones que deben ser abordadas.
[EN] The hyperconnectivity of technologically advanced societies exposes many people and activities to a high number of digital risks. Thus, cybercrime today is frequent. In a general sense, its perpetrators take advantage of technical and human vulnerabilities to cause damages on the operation of computer systems and obtain profits from it, affect the privacy of citizens and ultimately damage the general interests and the institutional stability. In this scenery, electronic evidence plays a decisive role at avoiding impunity for its perpetrators, who already take advantage from anonymity and legal uncertainties in relation to court jurisdictions, which persist even if a corpus of international regulations has been articulated. To overcome the previous deficiencies, the Organic Law 13/2015, of October 5, has been a milestone in the regulation of the investigative actions in Spain, more specifically in the registrations of mass storage devices and remote records of computer equipment, among other aspects, establishing a regulation which guarantees better the preservation of Fundamental Rights, but with limitations that must be addressed.
cibercrimen, investigative actions, pericial informática, diligencias de investigación, computer forensics, 5605.05 Derecho Penal, cybercrime, diligencias de investigaci?n, pericial inform?tica, electronic evidence, 5604.01 Funcionarios de Justicia y Procesos Judiciales, prueba electrónica, prueba electr?nica
cibercrimen, investigative actions, pericial informática, diligencias de investigación, computer forensics, 5605.05 Derecho Penal, cybercrime, diligencias de investigaci?n, pericial inform?tica, electronic evidence, 5604.01 Funcionarios de Justicia y Procesos Judiciales, prueba electrónica, prueba electr?nica
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
