
handle: 10366/130330
[ES] En recientes d?cadas se ha observado un renovado inter?s por algunos de los temas cl?sicos de la ontolog?a, desde ?reas de conocimiento externas a la filosof?a, sin embargo, este renacimiento ontol?gico ha ?estimulado? una multiplicidad y diversidad de teor?as y concepciones ?ontol?gicas? que ha dado como consecuencia una proliferaci?n de ?ontolog?as? y de interminables batallas para determinar qu? tipo de ?entidades? estudian sus respectivos ?dominios?, que a su vez se consideran aut?nomos e independientes entre s?, inclusive de la propia ontolog?a. En este sentido, el prop?sito de este trabajo es caracterizar y representar de manera adecuada estas ?ontolog?as?, dentro del marco general del debate acerca de la naturaleza de la ontolog?a. Es as? que, en la primera secci?n har? un diagnostico de la ontolog?a contempor?nea; en la segunda proporcionar? algunas definiciones y caracterizaciones de las principales concepciones, en especial de las denominadas ?ontolog?as aplicadas?; y en la tercera analizar? s? estas concepciones pueden ser consideradas diversos tipos de ontolog?a o simplemente son diversos niveles de ontolog?a. El marco de la discusi?n no se centrar? en confrontar todas estas nociones, sino en describirlas y analizarlas para ofrecer un enfoque sobre el estado actual de la ontolog?a y sus problemas. [EN] In recent decades there has been a renewed interest in some of the classic themes of ontology, from areas of knowledge external to philosophy; however, this ontological revival has ?stimulated? a multiplicity and diversity of ?ontological? theories and concepts that has resulted in a proliferation of ?ontologies? and endless battles to determine what kind of ?entities? study their respective ?domains?, which in turn are considered autonomous and independent, even of ontology itself. In this sense, the purpose of this work is to adequately characterize and represent these ?ontologies?, within the general framework of the debate about the nature of ontology. Thus, in the first section I will make a diagnosis of contemporary ontology; in the second I will provide some definitions and characterizations of the main concepts, especially the so-called ?applied ontologies?; and in the third I will analyze whether these concepts can be considered different types of ontology or simply are different levels of ontology. The framework of the discussion will not center on confronting all these notions, but to describe and analyze them to provide a focus on the current state of ontology and its problems.
Ontolog?a Aplicada, Realismo, Ontología Aplicada, World, Description, Realism, Structure, Carnap, Mundo, Fenomenología, Husserl, Descripción, Applied Ontology, Estructura, Hartmann, Fenomenolog?a, Phenomenology, Descripci?n
Ontolog?a Aplicada, Realismo, Ontología Aplicada, World, Description, Realism, Structure, Carnap, Mundo, Fenomenología, Husserl, Descripción, Applied Ontology, Estructura, Hartmann, Fenomenolog?a, Phenomenology, Descripci?n
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
