
A prospective one-year follow-up study was carried out among 189 civil servants of a municipal social service department. Its aim was to investigate whether psychosocial factors at work predict back pain prevalence at follow-up. The workers were questioned twice about personal characteristics, psychosocial factors at work, physical workload, back pain experience, and general health and well-being. Back pain was assessed as twelve month prevalence and pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS). In a univariate analysis the variables: high job demands, confinement to the workplace, depression, psychological complaints, and general health complaints, were positively related to back pain prevalence at follow-up. In a multivariate analysis, however, none of the odds ratios for psychosocial stressors differed significantly from one another. Among the back pain variables, pain intensity on the VAS was the best predictor of back pain at follow-up. In a final multivariate logistic regression model none of the above-mentioned variables contributed significantly, except for initial back pain. Initial back pain with low intensity and high intensity significantly predicted the prevalence of back pain at follow-up with odds ratios of 3.0 (90% CI: 1.5-6.0) and 10.3 (90% CI: 4.1-25.5), respectively. In conclusion, the present study does not provide clear evidence that psychosocial factors at work predict back pain.
Adult, Male, Back pain, Occupational Diseases, Logistic Models, Back Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Psychosocial factors, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Longitudinal study, Office workers, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Back pain, Occupational Diseases, Logistic Models, Back Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Psychosocial factors, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Longitudinal study, Office workers, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
