
handle: 10356/46692
Critics have accused die accounting profession of formulating audit opinions that tie highly technical and abstract. They lament dial audit opinions aw not understandable to the user and are devoid of communicative and predictive ability. This paper is aimed at addressing the above issue, m particular, it seeks to ascertain the predictive abih'ty of clean and qualified audit opinions, focusing on those 'ss-jed one year and two years prior to wihdmg up. The results give strong indications that audit opinions one year prior to failure do possess predictive value and that audit opinions do have information content.
RP 1/88
3 p.
DRNTU::Business::Auditing
DRNTU::Business::Auditing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
