Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV): in vitro artifact or a big problem for xenotransplantation?].

Authors: U, Martin; G, Steinhoff;

[Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV): in vitro artifact or a big problem for xenotransplantation?].

Abstract

The pig is the favorized donor species for clinical xenotransplantation. However, PATIENCE et al. could show, that porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV), released by a porcine kidney cell line, are capable of infecting human cell lines in vitro. Based on this discovery there is an ongoing discussion concerning the risks of zoonosis combined with xenotranplantation, which culminated in the demand for a moratorium on clinical transplantation of porcine organs. Recent findings exclude the possibility of an artifact due to the use of an immortalized cell line: Release of infectious PERV was also shown for mitogenic stimulated primary porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and, even more important, for primary porcine endothelial cells. In contrast, none of the recent retrospective in vivo studies showed evidence for PERV transmission, neither in patients after transplantation of porcine pancreas islet cells or after extracorporal perfusion of porcine kidneys, nor in baboons after transplantation of porcine endothelial cells. Currently it is not known, whether impairments of the immunological responses against foreign pathogens, which are associated with different xenotransplantation strategies, could enable PERV in vivo infection. Only in vivo experiments, if possible in suitable subhuman primate models, offer the prospect for a final risk assessment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Swine, Zoonoses, Endogenous Retroviruses, Transplantation, Heterologous, Animals, Humans, Artifacts, Risk Assessment, Cell Line, Retroviridae Infections

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!