Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ University of Limeri...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Preparing midwives for practice in Ireland: midwifery students and preceptor midwives’ experiences of the assessment of clinical practice

Authors: Bradshaw, Carmel;

Preparing midwives for practice in Ireland: midwifery students and preceptor midwives’ experiences of the assessment of clinical practice

Abstract

Background: Clinical placement is a critical component of midwifery programmes, where students develop competence in the care of women and their babies under the supervision of preceptor midwives. Preceptors are responsible for the assessment of competence of these students, whilst simultaneously managing the care of women and babies. Aim: To explore midwifery students and preceptor midwives’ experiences of assessment within clinical practice in a university in the Midwest of Ireland, at a time of significant change in midwifery education and practice. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used to interview students (n=32) and preceptors (n=29), with the data analysed using content analysis. Findings: Within an overarching theme of the context of assessment in practice, students and preceptors reported some commonalities. A clear process of assessment was valued by preceptors and students, but lack of continuity of preceptor and resource deficits, such as inadequate staffing levels affected this process. All the students and preceptors were challenged with the language of assessment. The importance of support for clinical assessment was highlighted by preceptors and students. Preceptors played a central role in students’ experiences from both a positive and a negative perspective, with unacceptable behaviours perpetrated by a minority of preceptors having a disproportionate effect on students. Students’ vulnerabilities were evident in their reluctance to report these behaviours. Benefits of preceptorship professionally and for the organisation were identified by the preceptors. They felt, however, that their role was unvalued by management, substantiated by inadequate resourcing and the volume and complexity of their caseload. Failing students was challenging, but safety of practice was the key factor underpinning preceptors’ ability to fail students when necessary. Conclusion: The findings highlight the cruciality of the context of the practice environment on these stakeholders’ experiences, with the future safety of practice reliant on robust assessment of students. A model of preceptorship is proposed to address the challenges identified, requiring a collaborative approach from universities and associated healthcare providers. Establishment and maintenance of this model will contribute to enriching the experiences of stakeholders, encourage recruitment and retention and enhance the quality of maternity care for women and their families.

Country
Ireland
Related Organizations
Keywords

midwives, Nursing, Ireland, clinical practice

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green