Quality assurance and data collection: current status, problems, and pitfalls.
Copyright policy )Quality assurance and data collection: current status, problems, and pitfalls.
1. It is important to measure and improve quality of care, particularly in this era of cost consciousness. 2. It is difficult to measure quality of care. 3. Current data collection systems have many inconsistencies and errors. 4. Statistical analysis cannot correct bad data. 5. Data based solely on DRG analysis are highly suspect. 6. Measurement of acuity of illness on admission is important for valid comparisons of outcomes. 7. We have a moral and ethical obligation to strive for better systems of measuring quality and to inform the public of the results of such measurements when they become sufficiently accurate.
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Data Collection, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Hospitals, Medical Records, United States
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Data Collection, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Hospitals, Medical Records, United States
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!