Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ BOA - Bicocca Open A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Evaluation of Methods for Formaldehyde Measurement in Industrial Emissions

Authors: A. M. Cefali'; C. Franchina; M. Gianotti; S. Ficocelli; L. Ferrero; E. Bolzacchini; D. Cipriano;

Evaluation of Methods for Formaldehyde Measurement in Industrial Emissions

Abstract

Formaldehyde is a widely present pollutant in both indoor and outdoor air. Due to its high reactivity and carcinogenic nature, it poses serious health risks and measurement challenges. In fact, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified formaldehyde as a Group 1 human carcinogen. As a result, countries like Italy have lowered emission limits to 5 mg/Nm3. This highlights the urgent need for accurate and reliable monitoring systems. To address this, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) created the working group TC 264 WG 40, which in 2021 published the standard CEN/TS 17638:2021. This document outlines reference methods for measuring formaldehyde in emissions from stationary sources. In this study, formaldehyde measurement techniques were evaluated through Proficiency Tests (PTs) using the 'LOOP' test bench. LOOP is a unique facility in Italy that simulates industrial emission conditions using synthetic gases. Different measurement methods were tested, particular focus was given to Method C (acetylacetone with photometric detection) and Method D (DNPH with HPLC analysis), both described in the CEN standard. Method C showed excellent temporal repeatability, while Method D required careful derivatization for consistent results. Interferents like SO2 significantly affected accuracy when Milli-Q water was used as the sampling solution, causing underestimations of 35–80%. However, an acidified solution (H2SO4 0.01 M) reduced errors to 5–30%. These results support the development of improved protocols and confirm the importance of PTs in validating reliable emission monitoring systems for regulatory and environmental protection.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Formaldehyde; test bench; proficiency test

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research