
handle: 10281/5445 , 11562/350712 , 2158/360958 , 11579/21370
The aim of this paper is to contribute to the debate about the electoral rules in Italy. In particular, we simulate some voting rules to test what is the best electoral system on the basis of a utility function that takes into account two indices — representativeness and governability. As long as governability is important, a mixed member system (75% first-past-the-post, 25% proportional representation) outperforms the others. Our tool is the software ALEX4.1.
HB Economic Theory, HG Finance, italian parliament, electoral system, simulations, HF Commerce, electoral system; simulations; evaluation, Italian Parliament, electoral system, simulations, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:A12, jel: jel:C88
HB Economic Theory, HG Finance, italian parliament, electoral system, simulations, HF Commerce, electoral system; simulations; evaluation, Italian Parliament, electoral system, simulations, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:A12, jel: jel:C88
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
