
handle: 10281/394654 , 11567/314521
Comparing trading systems performances has been traditionally addressed using ratios that allow to get a ranking. The popularity of a ratio depends on its simplicity i.e. on its capability both to be easily computed, and to get results that can be intepreted with reasonably lower efforts. Moreover, the ratio should not depend on the statistical population it is evaluated on, and it should get out pure numbers i.e. a score which is not dependent on any unit of measure. Over the past decades such ideal features have been variously matched by a number of different indexes: [2], [6], [7], [8] [9], [1], and [4] are some examples of ratios that can be built when one takes into account either the annual return of the trading system or a target return, as well as the number of winning trades opposed to the overall number of trades and so on.
Equity curves, Concentration
Equity curves, Concentration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
