
handle: 10281/17871 , 11577/2535869
The paper will outline a distinction between a syncretistic, and merely wishful, interpretation of the exchanges between different disciplines and a discovery-based interpretation of the role of interdisciplinarity in contemporary natural sciences. Some examples from the two sides are proposed, focusing on cases of constitutively interdisciplinary research programmes. The discussion underlines the still up-to-date methodological characteristics of systemic and integrated approaches.
Sincretismo; Interdisciplinarità; Complessità biologica; Hierarchy Theory of Evolution, Interdisciplinarity, systemic approaches, complexity theory, evolutionary pluralism, Third Culture
Sincretismo; Interdisciplinarità; Complessità biologica; Hierarchy Theory of Evolution, Interdisciplinarity, systemic approaches, complexity theory, evolutionary pluralism, Third Culture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
