
handle: 10278/43350
Jin ceramic production (1126-1234) has always been underestimated (if not altogether ignored) since the 13th C. However, archaeological discoveries of the past two decades impose a 360 degree re-evaluation. If it is true that Jin potters had the fortune to inherit the sophisticated wealth of experience accumulated by their Song and Liao predecessors, which allowed them to start from a very advanced technological level, it is also true that they continued to experiment, improving certain techniques and introducing new ones. Jin achievements in ceramic manufacture are attested by analysing the results offered by recent archaeological work at the sites of some of the most celebrated genres, such as Ding, Jun, Yaozhou, Cizhou, and Zhanggongxiang. This method proves the important role played by Jin potters in the history of Chinese ceramics and ought to dismantle the old prejudice, still widespread in China, according to which the Jurchen were barbarians unable to appreciate the refinement of Song culture, therefore great innovations and elegant specimens can only belong to the Song period.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
