Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>handle: 10261/9865
The main starting point of many of the contributions collected into the book is the kind of Twin Earth considerations, along with meaning individualism. Is Putnam's claim about water in this world and a stuff in an alternative world being different materials?. Is meaning in the head? One seems allowed to be skeptical about the starting point of the debate between such as emphasize broad content and those who think that the basic semantic entities are narrow contents, which would fail to be world-dependent or world-oriented. The kind of motivations prompting the essays collected into the book are likely to be regarded as in need of a deeper elucidation by such as have been more or less influenced by Quine. Pettit & McDowell's collection of essays is one of the books most scholars interested in the confines of philosophy of language and philosophy of mind will find worth reading.
Peer reviewed
Broad content, Philosophy of language, Individualismo semántico, Filosofía del lenguaje, Pettit, McDowell, Philosophy of mind, Filosofía de la mente, Quine, Willard Van Orman, Tierra gemela, Contenido amplio, Materia, Putnam, Meaning individualism, Twin Earth, Contenido estrecho, Stuff, Narrow content
Broad content, Philosophy of language, Individualismo semántico, Filosofía del lenguaje, Pettit, McDowell, Philosophy of mind, Filosofía de la mente, Quine, Willard Van Orman, Tierra gemela, Contenido amplio, Materia, Putnam, Meaning individualism, Twin Earth, Contenido estrecho, Stuff, Narrow content
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 51 | |
| downloads | 53 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts