Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/96315
In this paper we show that the performance of binary classifiers based on Boosted Random Ferns can be significantly improved by appropriately bootstrapping the training step. This results in a classifier which is both highly discriminant and computationally efficient and is particularly suitable when only small sets of training images are available. During the learning process, a small set of labeled images is used to train the boosting binary classifier. The classifier is then evaluated over the training set and warped versions of the classified and misclassified patches are progressively added into the positive and negative sample sets for a new retraining step. In this paper we thoroughly study the conditions under which this bootstrapping scheme improves the detection rates. In particular we assess the quality of detection both as a function of the number of bootstrapping iterations and the size of the training set. We compare our algorithm against state-of-the-art approaches for several databases including faces, cars, motorbikes and horses, and show remarkable improvements in detection rates with just a few bootstrapping steps.
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under Projects RobTaskCoop (DPI2010-17112), PAU (DPI2008-06022), PAU + (DPI2011-27510) and MIPRCV (Consolider-Ingenio 2010)(CSD2007-00018), and the EU CEEDS Project FP7-ICT-2009-5-95682 and the EU ARCAS Project FP7-ICT-2011-287617. The first author is funded by the Technical University of Catalonia.
Best Papers of Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA'2011).
Peer Reviewed
Object detection, Random ferns, Bootstrapping, Boosting
Object detection, Random ferns, Bootstrapping, Boosting
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 45 | |
| downloads | 112 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts