Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/80715
Objectives: To determine the number of patients at moderate to high risk for thromboembolism who are discharged from hospital emergency departments without appropriate treatment to prevent thrombosis. To analyze the factors associated with not starting thromboprophylaxis. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational, epidemiologic study included patients who came to a hospital emergency department with an acute medical emergency or an exacerbation of a chronic disease and who did not require admission. The dependent variable was failure to prescribe thromboprophylaxis on discharge. Independent variables assessed were demographic characteristics, medical specialty, general medical history, characteristics related to the emergency department visit, and foreseen mobility at discharge. The PRETEMED scale to quantify the need for prophylaxis was used. Results: We assessed a total of 2280 patients; 1850 (81.1%) were at moderate to high risk. Of these, 42.1% were discharged without thromboprophylaxis. The variables independently associated with not starting such treatment were bed rest not foreseen on discharge (odds ratio [OR], 19.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.83-27.99; P<.0005), reduced mobility not foreseen on discharge (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 5.2-8.9; P<.0005), history of neurodegenerative disease (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; P=.003), emergency department stay longer than 12 hours (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P=.007), and advanced age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P<.005). Conclusions: A large percentage of hospital emergency department patients at high to moderate risk of thromboembolism are discharged without prophylaxis.
Peer Reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 33 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts