Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/76096 , 10449/21719 , 11392/2130612
In this essay we explore questions on how to increase the visibility and utility of genetic information for biodiversity managers and policy makers. This is discussed in the light of Aichi CBD Target 13, which for the first time impels signatories to minimise genetic erosion and safe-guard genetic diversity. Drawing on qualitative results from a questionnaire sent to European conservation pro-fessionals by the ConGRESS Framework 7 Support Action(www.congressgenetics.eu), we summarise our preliminary findings on the attitudes and experiences of European conservation professionals in using genetics. We then dis- cuss the implications of these findings for academics involved in conservation genetics and suggest that a much closer partnership between academic conservation geneticists and conservation practitioners is necessary if the full potential of genetic tools in conservation is to be realised.
Peer reviewed
330, ta1184, Genetica di conservazione, Aichi target 13; Biodiversity management; Biodiversity policy; ConGRESS; Conservation genetics;, Biodiversity policy, Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA, Aichi target 13, ConGRESS, ta1181, Conservation genetics, Consortium, Biodiversity management
330, ta1184, Genetica di conservazione, Aichi target 13; Biodiversity management; Biodiversity policy; ConGRESS; Conservation genetics;, Biodiversity policy, Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA, Aichi target 13, ConGRESS, ta1181, Conservation genetics, Consortium, Biodiversity management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 136 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 47 | |
| downloads | 437 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts