Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/6901
[ES] Se parte de que el objetivo y el sentido de la investigación, en Arqueología y en ciencias humano-sociales, es identificar las relaciones de significación que se producen en la realidad y que de hecho la producen. Se hace notar cómo la crítica del positivismo clásico ha generado una situación paradógica, ya que la pretensión de descubrir las interrelación de la (falsa) objetividad con el sistema de poder moderno han abierto la puerta a la legitimación ideológica del neoliberalismo. Ante el dilema de que la objetividad no es posible y la subjetividad no es suficiente, se propugna un post-positivismo, con concomitancias entre la tradición analítica y la fenomenología, que muestra que la comprensión, diálogo y tolerancia intercultural son todavía posibles. Aunque se asume la necesidad de dar cuenta de la función activa del individuo en la sociedad, se reconoce que, desde lo individual, no se puede construir ni interpretar el mundo, por lo que es necesario seguir el camino de lo social a lo individual y no viceversa.
[EN] The main objective and sense of research in archaeology and human-social sciences is to identify the relationships of significance which constitute the reality. The critic of classic positivism has produced a paradoxical situation as the pretension of discovering the net of relationships of the (false) objectivity in the modern power system has opened the way to the ideological legitimacy of neoliberalism. In the presence of the dolemma in which objectivity is not possible and subjectivity is not enough, the author defends a post-positivism approach. This approach present concomitances with analytical tradition and phenomenology, and demostrates that comprehension, dialogue and intercultural tolerance are still possible. Although it assumes the necessity of dealing with the active function of the individual in society, it is recognized that from the individual it is impossible the building and interpretation of the world. So we need to follow the way from the social to individual and not the reverse track.
Peer reviewed
post-positivismo, Individuo y sociedad, False objectivity, Objetividad falsa, Subjetividad, Individual and social, LaPa, Subjectivity, Laboratorio de Arqueología del Paisaje, Laboratory of Landscape Archaeology
post-positivismo, Individuo y sociedad, False objectivity, Objetividad falsa, Subjetividad, Individual and social, LaPa, Subjectivity, Laboratorio de Arqueología del Paisaje, Laboratory of Landscape Archaeology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 79 | |
| downloads | 143 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts