Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/62251 , 1871/37262
Any investigation of environmental processes related to chemical substances or their effects depends on reliable, comparable analytical data. This also holds true for the impact of climate change on occurrence, distribution and effects of emerging pollutants, with respect to which there is particular concern regarding the reliability of analytical data, due to lack of harmonization in method validation and requirements for quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC).We present a recent European approach to developing a harmonized framework for method validation, QA/QC and provision of environmental data on emerging pollutants. The validation approach has been tested and improved by three case studies. We outline the main concept of the validation approach as well as the results of the case studies. This European validation framework turned out to be a feasible tool to check the fitness for purpose of analytical methods and to improve the reliability of environmental analytical data, particularly for emerging pollutants. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
From 2005 to 2009, the NORMAN network was a Co-ordination Action funded by the European Commission under the 6th Framework Program, Contract No. 018486. We would also like to thank Anja Duffek (Umweltbundesamt, Germany) for providing details on the case study on decaBDE.
Peer Reviewed
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, ENVIRONMENTAL DATA, [SDV.TOX.ECO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Ecotoxicology, FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, CLIMATE CHANGE, METHOD VALIDATION, HARMONIZATION, QUALITY ASSURANCE, EMERGING POLLUTANT, QUALITY CONTROL, ANALYTICAL DATA, EUROPEAN VALIDATION FRAMEWORK
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, ENVIRONMENTAL DATA, [SDV.TOX.ECO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Ecotoxicology, FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, CLIMATE CHANGE, METHOD VALIDATION, HARMONIZATION, QUALITY ASSURANCE, EMERGING POLLUTANT, QUALITY CONTROL, ANALYTICAL DATA, EUROPEAN VALIDATION FRAMEWORK
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 33 |

Views provided by UsageCounts