Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/57724
People may be surprised to notice certain regularities that hold in existing knowledge they have had for some time. That is, they may learn without getting new factual information. We argue that this can be partly explained by computational complexity. We show that, given a knowledge base, finding a small set of variables that obtain a certain value of R2is computationally hard, in the sense that this term is used in computer science. We discuss some of the implications of this result and of fact-free learning in general.
Computational complexity, Linear regression, Rule-based reasoning, Learning, Behavioral Economics, jel: jel:D11, jel: jel:D8, jel: jel:C8
Computational complexity, Linear regression, Rule-based reasoning, Learning, Behavioral Economics, jel: jel:D11, jel: jel:D8, jel: jel:C8
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 49 | |
| downloads | 142 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts