
handle: 10261/57521
In this paper, we examine the relationship between firms' cost structures and the order of exit from declining industries. We distinguish between two fundamental causes of demand decline, namely a shrinkage of the consumer base and a decrease in consumers' willingness to pay. We show that it is not necessarily best to be small and flexible - the order of exit in a market driven outcome depends on the manner in which demand shrinks. We find that from a welfare perspective, the order of exit determined by market forces is not necessarily desirable. However, simple rules for picking 'winners' based on current unit cost, profitability, or productive efficiency do not provide sound guidance for policy. © 1991.
Financial support from CICYT No. PB 86-013 is gratefully acknowledged.
Peer Reviewed
et al.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
