Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/57184
This study evaluated three probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei LC-01, L. acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12) and two yoghurt strains (L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus LBY-27 and Streptococcus thermophilus STY-31) with regard to their resistance to simulated gastrointestinal stress, and their ability to interact with human intestinal epithelial cells. The viability of strains was analyzed by measurements of fluorescence-stained cells and their growth by plate colony-counts. The results reveal that for all tested strains, gastric emptying (above pH 3.0) would release a large number of viable cells ranging from 91% for L. paracasei to 53% for S. thermophilus into the intestinal tract, and that between 12 and 23% of them subsequently survive intestinal stress. Among them L. paracasei showed the highest resistance to gastric stress. All the bacteria adhered to the Caco-2 cell line, with the highest adhesions being observed for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (9%) and L. acidophilus (7%). Binding of all strains to Caco-2 cells did not result in a significant increase in the production of IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines, suggesting that these bacteria do not trigger an overt inflammatory response in human intestine epithelial cells
This work was supported by the following Spanish entities: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC) (grants: AGL2004-07285-C02-01 and AGL2006-11932-C05-01), by MEC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (grant 2006 7 0I026) and by Comunidad de Madrid (grant S-0505/AGR-0153) and Consolider Ingenio 2010: Fun-c-Food CSD2007-00063. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2011) under grant agreement no. 211441
31 p.-4 fig.-2 tab.-1 supl. tab.-1 supl. fig.
Peer reviewed
Immunomodulation, Probiotic bacteria, Lactic acid bacteria, Adhesion, Gastrointestinal stress
Immunomodulation, Probiotic bacteria, Lactic acid bacteria, Adhesion, Gastrointestinal stress
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 61 | |
| downloads | 146 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts