Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Two porins, OmpK36 and OmpK35, have been described previously in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and they are homologous to the Escherichia coli porins OmpC and OmpF, respectively, at both the DNA and amino acid levels. Optimal resolution of the two K. pneumoniae porins by electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gels is not achieved using gel systems already described for E. coli and requires modifications of the bisacrylamide content of the resolving gels. Once resolved, identification of porins OmpK36 and OmpK35 cannot be based solely on their apparent molecular masses since in some strains the OmpK36 porin migrates faster than the OmpK35 porin, whilst in other strains OmpK35 is the faster-migrating porin. Expression of OmpK35 porin is increased in low-osmolarity medium and, combined with Western blot analysis, this allows for the identification of both porins. Application of this identification system showed that most isolates lacking expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases express the two porins, whereas most isolates producing these beta-lactamases express only porin OmpK36, and the OmpK35 porin is either very low or not expressed.
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacterial Proteins, Osmotic Pressure, Molecular Sequence Data, Humans, Porins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, beta-Lactamases, Outer-membrane proteins, Klebsiella Infections
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacterial Proteins, Osmotic Pressure, Molecular Sequence Data, Humans, Porins, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, beta-Lactamases, Outer-membrane proteins, Klebsiella Infections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 178 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 58 | |
| downloads | 27 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts