Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Smoking Impact on Radiographic Progression in An Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort

Authors: Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Gómez-Puerta, José A.; Cabrera, Sonia; Cañete, Juan D.; Hernández, M. V.; Graell, Eduard; Ercilla, Guadalupe; +4 Authors

Smoking Impact on Radiographic Progression in An Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort

Abstract

Smoking is a known predictor of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its effect in radiographic progression is still controversial. To investigate the effects of cigarette smoking on radiographic progression in an early RA cohort two years after the beginning of DMARD therapy. Method: One hundred and fifty six patients (83% female) with early RA (disease duration 20 pack/year). Radiographic damage at one and two years was higher in current smokers compared with non-smokers, although only in the EJC at two years the difference was statistically significant (1.2±1.7 vs. 0.7±1.7, p=0.04). The Larsen score at two years was higher in current smokers than in non-smokers although the difference was not significant (7.4±12.9 vs. 4.2±6.7, p>0.05). In the univariate analysis taking Larsen-Scott score as the measure of radiographic damage, female sex, higher HAQ at disease onset, the presence of anticitrullinated antibodies, the shared epitope (SE) and the HLA-DRB*04 had a significant effect on radiological score. In the multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline radiographic damage, female sex, HLA-DRB*04 genotype and current smoking were independently associated with two year radiographic damage measured by the Larsen Score as well as with the EJC (Table). No significant differences were seen in clinical disease activity or rates of EULAR response at one and two years of follow-up between smokers and non smokers. Conclusion: In our early RA cohort, current smoking emerges as an independent factor for radiographic progression after two years of DMARDs.

Peer reviewed

Keywords

Radiography, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tobacco use

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 29
  • 29
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
29
Green