Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In order to understand the genetic basis for the evolutionary success of modern humans, it is necessary to compare their genetic makeup to that of closely related species. Unfortunately, our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees, are evolutionarily quite distant. With the advent of ancient DNA study and more recently paleogenomics - the study of the genomes of ancient organisms - it has become possible to compare human genomes to those of much more closely related groups. Our closest known relatives are the Neanderthals, which evolved and lived in Europe and Western Asia, from about 600,000 years ago until their disappearance around 30,000 years ago following the expansion of anatomically modern humans into their range. The closely related Denisovans are only known by virtue of their DNA, which has been extracted from bone fragments dating around 30,000 to 50,000 years ago found in a single Siberian cave. Analyses of Neanderthal and Denisovan nuclear and mitochondrial genomes have revealed surprising insights into these archaic humans as well as our own species. The genomes provide a preliminary catalogue of derived amino acids that are specific to all extant modern humans, thus offering insights into the functional differences between the three lineages. In addition, the genomes provide evidence of gene flow between the three lineages after anatomically modern humans left Africa, drastically changing our view of human evolution.
Cell Nucleus, Gene Flow, Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Fossils, Genome, Human, Genetic Variation, Hominidae, Biological Evolution, DNA, Mitochondrial, Evolution, Molecular, Species Specificity, Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Demography, Neanderthals
Cell Nucleus, Gene Flow, Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Fossils, Genome, Human, Genetic Variation, Hominidae, Biological Evolution, DNA, Mitochondrial, Evolution, Molecular, Species Specificity, Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Demography, Neanderthals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 37 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts