Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Minor elements determination and evaluation of diffusion/segregation effects on ultra-thin layers using pulsed-RF-GD-TOFMS

Authors: Pisonero J; LICCIARDELLO, Antonino; Hierro Rodriguez A; Quiros C; Sanz Medel A; Bordel N.;

Minor elements determination and evaluation of diffusion/segregation effects on ultra-thin layers using pulsed-RF-GD-TOFMS

Abstract

Depth profile analyses of ultra-thin layers and their interfaces are investigated, using an innovative Pulsed-radiofrequency Glow Discharge Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (pulsed-rf-GD-TOFMS), to obtain information about the presence of minor elements and to evaluate segregation/diffusion processes at the interfaces. A series of ultra-thin Nb/Al1¿x Co x bilayers, deposited on Si wafers by dc-magnetron sputtering, is analyzed. An Al1¿x Co x layer is first deposited on the Si substrate with controlled constant thickness (t AlCo = 6 nm), and different stoichiometries (Co atomic concentration, x = 0, 0.015, 0.035, 0.045, 0.09, 0.35). Then, a Nb layer is deposited on top of the AlCo one, with a thickness t Nb = 50 nm that is also kept constant along the whole series. Qualitative depth profiles of those layered sandwich-type samples are determined using our pulsed-rf-GD-TOFMS setup, indicating segregation of Al and Co and diffusion of Co into the Si substrate, as a function of the Co atomic concentration in the AlCo internal layer. Additionally, a linear calibration curve was achieved plotting the Co atomic concentration versus the total integrated Co ion signal, allowing the Co quantification in ultra-thin layers (6 nm). Moreover, Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) was used as a reference technique to validate the high analytical potential of pulsed-rf-GD-TOFMS for the analysis of ultra-thin layers and interfaces. The comparative analytical performance of both techniques is discussed.

Peer Reviewed

et al.

Countries
Spain, Italy
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 27
    download downloads 33
  • 27
    views
    33
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
14
Average
Average
Top 10%
27
33
Green
Related to Research communities