Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ El profesional de la...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
El profesional de la información
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluación formal de blogs con contenidos académicos y de investigación en el área de documentación

Authors: Jiménez Hidalgo, Sonia; Salvador Bruna, Javier;

Evaluación formal de blogs con contenidos académicos y de investigación en el área de documentación

Abstract

[ES] Los blogs, weblogs o bitácoras son herramientas que permiten la edición de cualquier tipo de contenidos en internet de manera sencilla y rápida. Estas virtudes han hecho que también sean utilizados por la comunidad investigadora y académica para el intercambio de ideas, convirtiéndose, de esta forma, en un nuevo canal que la ciencia y el conocimiento académico dispone para la difusión y confrontación de sus avances. No obstante, y como sucede en otros medios de comunicación científica más tradicionales, parece necesario y positivo el establecimiento de una serie de criterios de calidad que permita determinar en qué medida dichos medios son una forma fiable de intercambio de información. En este artículo se analizan aquellos aspectos de la calidad relacionados con la estructura formal de los blogs que incorporan contenidos de carácter científico y académico, sin tener en cuenta, por el momento, sus contenidos.

[EN] Weblogs (or blogs) are tools for editing and publishing all types of content on the Internet, easily and quickly. The research and academic communities have taken advantage of them for exchanging ideas and information, thus converting blogs into a new communication channel to disseminate and discuss new scientific advances. However, as has occurred with other traditional means of scientific communication, it would be useful to establish quality criteria for determining the extent to which blogs are a reliable way to exchange scientific ideas. In this article the quality of the formal structure of the blogs is analysed, as opposed to the quality of their content.

Versión final disponible en: http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/

Peer reviewed

Keywords

Herramientas colaborativas, Blogs académicos, Collaborative tools, Evaluación de la calidad formal, Scientific blogs, Academic blogs, Blogs científicos, Software social, Social software, Formal quality assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 53
    download downloads 144
  • 53
    views
    144
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
53
144
Green
bronze