Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The effects of the sea urchin grazing on the Thalassodendron ciliatum seagrass beds of a Kenyan lagoon.

Authors: Alcoverro, Teresa; Mariani, Simone;

The effects of the sea urchin grazing on the Thalassodendron ciliatum seagrass beds of a Kenyan lagoon.

Abstract

We present the results of experimental and descriptive field studies on the effects of dense sea urchin aggregations on seagrass beds in the Mombasa lagoon (Kenya). The study area was dominated by the slow-growing seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum (49.6% cover), and supported an average sea urchin density of 1.6 m–2, mostly Tripneustes gratilla (90%). In the T. ciliatum meadows, 39% of the cover was heavily grazed by the sea urchins (more than 75% dead shoots), 23.4% was moderately grazed (more than 50% dead shoots) and 38.5% was slightly grazed (19.8% dead shoots). We observed 5 aggregations (fronts) of T. gratilla in the study area (5000 m2), 4 of these within the T. ciliatum meadows. These aggregations were linear in structure, with mean densities of 10.4 m–2, and left in their wake a ‘trailing edge’ area of defoliated seagrass rhizomes (85% dead shoots). Grazing rates were measured in 2 ways: marked permanent quadrats along the fronts, and sea urchin addition experiments. The first method produced grazing rates of 1.8 ± 0.43 shoots m–2 d–1, and the second produced slightly higher values of 5 ± 0.86 shoots m–2 d–1. New shoot recruitment was estimated from the marked permanent quadrats in the fronts as 0.32 shoots m–2 d–1. Simple models indicated that the return interval (i.e. the average frequency of the passage of sea urchin fronts through a seagrass patch) for the ‘sea urchin grazing fronts’ was 99 or 34 mo, depending on the method used, and that T. ciliatum recovery time was 44 mo. We conclude that the sea urchin aggregations observed in the Mombasa lagoon control T. ciliatum density by grazing its exposed apical tips.

This study was financed by the former Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.Kenya’s Office of the President and Kenya Wildlife Service provided permission to undertake this research (Research Clearance No. OP/13/001/15C 104, to TA).

9 páginas; 6 figuras, 1 tabla.

Peer reviewed

Keywords

Grazing, Thalassodendron ciliatum, Tripneustes gratilla, Herbivory, Sea urchins, Seagrass

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 43
    download downloads 40
  • 43
    views
    40
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
43
40
Green