Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Evolución por selección natural: Una teoría cada vez más sólida.

Authors: Merino, Santiago;

Evolución por selección natural: Una teoría cada vez más sólida.

Abstract

[ES]: La teoría de la evolución por selección natural ha generado controversia desde su aparición hace ahora algo más de 150 años. Esto puede considerarse normal dadas las importantes connotaciones que tiene para los seres humanos más allá de las estrictamente científicas. Sin embargo, es relativamente fácil encontrarse con críticas vertidas desde el ámbito científico en las que se deja ver claramente la influencia de prejuicios personales. Casi cada nueva publicación que ofrece la más minima novedad en cuanto a la evolución se intenta aprovechar para defender el final de la teoría de la evolución por selección natural. Cuando indagamos un poco en la crítica en seguida nos encontramos con que encaja perfectamente con la teoría y simplemente la enriquece con algún detalle que todavía se comienza a explorar. Los que planteaban la crítica o bien no entendían la teoría o bien no la quieren entender. Al final la teoría de la evolución por selección natural sale reforzada con cada nuevo embate.

[EN]: The theory of evolution by natural selection has generated controversy since its appearance just 150 years ago. This can be considered normal given the important connotations for human beings beyond those strictly scientific. However, it is relatively easy to find criticisms from scientists which clearly show the influence of personal prejudices. Almost every new scientific publication that offers the minimum novelty on evolution is exploited to defend the end of the theory of evolution by natural selection. When the criticism is investigated we find that fits perfectly with the theory and simply enriches it with some detail still waiting a deeply exploration. Those who raised the criticism either did not understand the theory or do not want to understand it. At the end the theory of evolution by natural selection is reinforced with each new criticism.

Este artículo se ha escrito durante la dirección del proyecto CGL2009- 09439 del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

4 páginas, 5 figuras, 1 viñeta.-- Artículo publicado en revista de divulgación científica.

Peer reviewed

Keywords

Mutación, Mutation, Prejudices, Críticas, Prejuicios, Criticism, SNPs

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 87
  • 87
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
87
Green