
doi: 10.1086/171733
handle: 10261/385687
The influence of source clustering on the distribution of fluctuations in integrated background radiations [the P(D) curve] is analyzed. The general framework to model the P(D) curve given the beam profile, the source counts (the log N-log S relation), and the source correlation functions is presented. It is then shown that an account of source clustering in terms of an excess variance [i.e., via the convolution of the model P(D) curves with a Gaussian] is generally inappropriate. Since the correct way to account for source clustering requires all of the n-point source correlation functions, and there is little or no observational information of these quantities for n > 2, simple models with few parameters are presented, namely, a Gaussian clustering model and a shot noise clustering model. To illustrate the effects of source clustering in the determination of source counts via analysis of confusion noise, simulations with the shot noise clustering model and a top-hat beam are generated and P(D) curves subsequently fitted. The amount by which source counts are overestimated if clustering is not properly accounted for is quantified.
Peer reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
