Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Why Was My Manuscript Rejected without Review? Focus on Public Health and Environmental Exposures, Ecotoxicology, and Micro/Nanoplastics

Authors: Daniel Schlenk; Pablo Gago-Ferrero; Frederic D. L. Leusch; Huahong Shi; Bin Wang; Xiaowei Zhang; Margaret Mills;

Why Was My Manuscript Rejected without Review? Focus on Public Health and Environmental Exposures, Ecotoxicology, and Micro/Nanoplastics

Abstract

Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a high-impact, broad-reaching interdisciplinary environmental science and technology journal dedicated to investigating the depth, complexity, and sustainability of our environment and the development of new technologies to support that sustainability. The journal has a core commitment to remain a thought leader, publishing the latest advances of high novelty that significantly move the field forward in new directions and discoveries. Alongside this aim comes implicit expectations of excellence and quality, and these high standards underpin ES&T’s ability to publish the most important and impactful research advances in environmental science and technology. ES&T receives many thousands of submissions each year. Selecting which papers move through the initial assessment made by our team of expert Executive and Associate Editors and onto external peer review is based on whether the manuscript contains the basic expectations of quality for a given research field. General guidance for what ES&T is seeking in quality submissions was described in the editorial Why my Paper Was Rejected Without Review and includes fundamental expectations of appropriate scientific rigor, sound experimental setup and reporting, replicate samples, treatment groups and controls, analytical quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and other key considerations. However, for a given research topic within the broad umbrella of environmental science and technology there are also quality expectations unique to that particular field. This editorial provides insights into the basic quality expectations for submissions in public health and environmental exposures, ecotoxicology, and micro/nanoplastics research.

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

http://metadata.un.org/sdg/17, Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development, Reviews, Manuscripts

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!