Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/381076
AbstractThe green transition requires new, clean, inexpensive, and sustainable strategies to prepare controllable bimetallic and multimetallic nanostructures. Cu−Ag nanostructures, for example, are promising bimetallic catalysts for different electrocatalytic reactions such as carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide reduction. In this work, we present the one‐step preparation method of electrodeposited Cu−Ag with tunable composition and morphology from choline chloride plus urea deep eutectic solvent (DES), a non‐toxic and green DES. We have assessed how different electrodeposition parameters affect the morphology and composition of our nanostructures. We combine electrochemical methods with ex‐situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to characterize the nanostructures. We have estimated the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) and roughness factor (R) by lead underpotential deposition (UPD). The copper/silver ratio in the electrodeposited nanostructures is highly sensitive to the applied potential, bath composition, and loading. We observed that silver‐rich nanostructures were less adherent whereas the increase in copper content led to more stable and homogenous films with disperse rounded nanostructures with tiny spikes. These spikes were more stable when the deposition rate was fast enough and the molar ratio of Cu and Ag was no greater than approximately two to one.
Deep eutectic solvent, deep eutectic solvent, green solvent, tunable nanocatalysts, Green solvent, Tunable nanocatalysts, TP250-261, copper-silver nanostructures, Chemistry, Industrial electrochemistry, Electrodeposition, Copper-silver nanostructures, QD1-999
Deep eutectic solvent, deep eutectic solvent, green solvent, tunable nanocatalysts, Green solvent, Tunable nanocatalysts, TP250-261, copper-silver nanostructures, Chemistry, Industrial electrochemistry, Electrodeposition, Copper-silver nanostructures, QD1-999
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 25 | |
| downloads | 28 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts