
handle: 10261/37127
[ES] Se comparan en este trabajo dos métodos de injerto de "corona": el típico, A y una modificación de éste, B, consistente en suprimir totalmente la corteza de la parte de la púa que se introduce en el patrón. El porcentaje de prendimientos es significativamente mayor por el método típico, A, que por el modificado, B. La soldadura, es más perfecta y la unión mecánicamente más fuerte por el método modificado, B. En determinadas condiciones de medio, donde los fuertes vientos sean frecuentes, puede ser aconsejable el injerto por el procedimiento B ensayado.
[EN] Two ways of preparing the scion for the rind graft (crown graft) are compared. In method (A) the scions were prepared as for whip-and-tongue grafting but without the tongue. In method (B) the scion was prepared in the same way and its rind removed on the lower end to be introduced in the stock. Higher porcentage "take" was obtained by method (A) while method (B) provided with mechanicaly stronger unions.
Peer reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
