Craniométrie comparée entre les chamois pyrénéen et cantabrique

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 1986Publisher:Walter de Gruyter GmbHJournal:Mammalia, volume 50 (issn: 0025-1461, eissn: 1864-1547,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Fernandez-Lopez, J. M.; Garcia-Gonzalez, R.;

doi: 10.1515/mamm.1986.50.1.87

handle: 10261/36510

Craniométrie comparée entre les chamois pyrénéen et cantabrique

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

[ES]: Se han examinado dos muestras de 26 y 64 cráneos de rebeco cantábrico y pirenaico respectivamente. Sobre ellos se ha tomado un total de 21 medidas craneales. los valores medios se han comparado estadisticamente entre sexos y subespecies. Las dimensiones de los cráneos cantábricos son mas pequeñas que en los pirenaicos.

[EN]: Twenty-one cranial measures were taken on two samples of 26 and 64 skulls of cantabrian and pyrenean chamois respectively. mean values have been statistically compared between subspecies and sexes. Skull dimensions of cantabrian chamois are smaller than pyrenean ones.

[FR]: Les auteurs ont étudié 26 crânes de la sous-espèce cantabrique de chamois et 64 de la sous-espèce pyrénéenne. Sur chauqe échantillon on apris 21 mesures crâniennes. Les dimensions des crânes cantabriques sont toujours plus petites que celles des pyrénéens.

11 páginas, 2 figuras, 3 tablas.

Peer reviewed

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	5
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average