Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/354754
In this work, the performance of a photoelectrochemical cell to degrade a mixture of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in distilled water and simulated wastewater effluents (SWWE) was assessed. The CECs mixture included trimethoprim (TMP), diclofenac (DFC), sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and carbamazepine (CBZ) (100 μg·L−1 each). WO3 nanoplate-like structures synthesized on fluorine tin oxide coated glass (FTO) were used as the photoanode with Pt or carbon gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) as the counter electrode. The most efficient degradation of the CECs was obtained with the WO3-GDE combination. Significant degradation of the CECs was observed under visible only radiation. Even under visible radiation, reasonable rate constants 5.67·10-3, 5.35·10-3, 2.9·10-3 and 4.35·10-3 min−1 were obtained for TMP, SMX, CBZ and DFC degradation. The degradation mechanism at the cathode and the photoanode was elucidated using a two-compartment cell, which allowed the identification of reactive species generated at each electrode. Photogenerated holes were the main responsible for CEC degradation in SWWE. With the carbon GDE, a high Faradaic efficiency (55 %) for H2O2 production was observed. © 2023
The authors wish to thank the EU-India H2020 cooperation program for funding this work under the PANIWATER project (RIA GA-820718). Álvaro Tolosana Moranchel also thank the Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte of the Comunidad de Madrid for the Ayuda Destinada a la Atracción de Talento Investigador (2020-T2/AMB-19927) granted to him.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141442
Peer reviewed
Carbon gas diffusion electrode, Photoelectrocatalysis, Contaminant of emerging concern, WO3 photoanode, Reactive oxygen species
Carbon gas diffusion electrode, Photoelectrocatalysis, Contaminant of emerging concern, WO3 photoanode, Reactive oxygen species
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 38 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts