Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/350918
Much research on the ethics of automated driving (AD) focusses on moral decision-making processes in extreme traffic situations. However, more likely scenarios involving daily trade-offs among different values in the design and implementation of AD are also worth considering. Our main goal was to provide an in-depth analysis of how diverse experts and stakeholders prioritize different socio-political values. Through a series of workshops, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups, we assessed today's major social, ethical, and legal concerns related to AD, as well as their relative prioritization in specific near-future realistic traffic scenarios. We summarize experts’ and lay-people's opinions on the trade-offs among six socio-political values (privacy, autonomy, safety, security, performance, and costs) and present overall recommendations for the design of future AD technologies.
This study was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 875597 - HADRIAN (Holistic Approach for Driver Role Integration and Automation Allocation for European Mobility Needs) project
Este artículo está sujeto a una licencia CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Peer reviewed
Ethical and political values, Ethics, Machine tools, Automated driving, Human-Machine Integration, Traffic psychology, Algorithmic Ethics
Ethical and political values, Ethics, Machine tools, Automated driving, Human-Machine Integration, Traffic psychology, Algorithmic Ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 | |
| downloads | 31 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts