Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Implementation of the clinical practice guideline “Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers for interprofessional teams”

Authors: Romero-Navarro, Andrea; Quiñoz-Gallardo, María Dolores; Herrera-Espiñeira, Carmen; Barrientos-Trigo, Sergio; Porcel-Gálvez, Ana María;

Implementation of the clinical practice guideline “Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers for interprofessional teams”

Abstract

[ES] Objetivo: evaluar la implantación de la guía Valoración y manejo de las lesiones por presión para equipos interprofesionales de la Asociación Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario (RNAO®) en el Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (Granada, España), con objeto de identificar mejoras producidas en la formación de profesionales, en el proceso de cuidados y en los resultados en salud de los pacientes con lesiones por presión (LPP). Método: estudio descriptivo longitudinal retrospectivo (2018-2022). Variables: formación impartida, materiales elaborados, edad, sexo, valoración del riesgo de LPP, plan de cuidados especifico, uso de superficie especial para el manejo de la presión, LPP previas y nuevas, categoría de LPP, cicatrización y días de estancia de hospitalización. Resultados: la formación pasó de tres actividades y 86 asistentes a 16 actividades y 229 asistentes, y se elaboraron nueve materiales de apoyo a la formación. La valoración del riesgo y el plan de cuidados se realizó a más del 88% de la muestra. La aplicación de superficies especiales descendió en 2021 a 57,1%. Un 49,2% de pacientes tuvo una nueva lesión durante su estancia hospitalaria, siendo predominante la categoría II y presentaron signos de cicatrización un 42,6% de las lesiones tratadas. Conclusiones: la implantación ha supuesto un incremento de la actividad formativa en actualización de conocimientos sobre metodología de implantación de evidencia y en el manejo de LPP. El proceso de cuidados del paciente con LPP se realiza conforme a alguna de las recomendaciones de la guía, siendo necesario mejorar. Hay indicios que apuntan a que las cifras de LPP nosocomiales están disminuyendo.

[EN] Objectives: to assess the implementation of the guideline "Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers (PU) for interprofessional teams” by the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO®) at the Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (Granada, Spain), with the objective of identifying any improvements made in professional training, in the care process, and in the health outcomes for patients with PU. Method: a descriptive longitudinal retrospective study (2018-2022). Variables: training given, materials prepared, age, gender, risk assessment for PU, specific care plan, use of a special surface for pressure management, previous and new PU, PU categories, PU healing, and hospitalization days. Results: training went from three activities and 86 attendees to 16 activities and 229 attendees, and nine support materials were prepared. Risk assessment and care plan were applied to >88% of the sample. The use of special surfaces was reduced to 57.1% in 2021; 49.2% of patients presented a new lesion during their hospital stay, with Category II as the predominant; 42.6% of the lesions treated presented healing signs. Conclusions: the implementation has represented an increase in training activities for updating the knowledge regarding methodology for evidence implementation and in PU management. The process of care for patients with PU is conducted following only some of the recommendations in the guideline, and an improvement is required. There are signs pointing to a reduction in the number of hospital PU.

El Programa de implantación de guías de buenas prácticas en Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® está parcialmente financiado por el Centro Español para los Cuidados de Salud basados en la Evidencia: un Centro de Excelencia del Instituto Joanna Briggs.

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

Práctica basada en la evidencia, Best practice guidelines, Evidence based practice, Úlceras por presión, Guías de práctica clínica, Implementation science, Investigación en medicina traslacional, Pressure ulcer, Ciencia de la implementación, Knowledge translation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 41
    download downloads 25
  • 41
    views
    25
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
41
25
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!