Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract Chemical-based interventions are mostly used to control insects that are harmful to human health and agriculture or that simply cause a nuisance. An overreliance on these insecticides however raises concerns for the environment, human health, and the development of resistance, not only in the target species. As such, there is a critical need for the development of novel nonchemical technologies to control insects. Electrocution traps using UV light as an attractant are one classical nonchemical approach to insect control but lack the specificity necessary to target only pest insects and to avoid harmless or beneficial species. Here we review the fundamental physics behind electric fields (EFs) and place them in context with electromagnetic fields more broadly. We then focus on how novel uses of strong EFs, some of which are being piloted in the field and laboratory, have the potential to repel, capture, or kill (electrocute) insects without the negative side effects of other classical approaches. As EF–insect science remains in its infancy, we provide recommendations for future areas of research in EF–insect science.
Insecticides, Ultraviolet Rays, Electroreception, Integrated pest management, Review, Insect Control, Physical pest control, mechanoreception, Magnetoreception, Animals, Magnetoreception; mechanoreception;
Insecticides, Ultraviolet Rays, Electroreception, Integrated pest management, Review, Insect Control, Physical pest control, mechanoreception, Magnetoreception, Animals, Magnetoreception; mechanoreception;
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 40 | |
| downloads | 57 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts