Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

DORA y su impacto en la evaluación científica, 10 años desde su nacimiento

Authors: Melero, Remedios;

DORA y su impacto en la evaluación científica, 10 años desde su nacimiento

Abstract

[ES] La Declaración de San Francisco, conocida como DORA, se publicó en el año 2013, con unos principios sobre la evaluación de la investigación que después de 10 años siguen estando vivos. Estos principios se basan en evaluar la calidad intrínseca de los resultados de investigación, y no del medio dónde se publiquen, en la transparencia de los datos en los que se basan los indicadores de “prestigio” y, sobre todo, en fomentar la inclusión de una evaluación cualitativa de los trabajos de investigación y de la medida de su impacto social, huyendo de los índices puramente cuantitativos de las publicaciones. Estos principios han servido de base e inspiración de nuevas iniciativas y proyectos enfocados al análisis y diseño de nuevos modelos de evaluación científica en un mundo digital.

[EN] The San Francisco Declaration, known as DORA, was published in 2013, with principles on the evaluation of research that after 10 years are still alive. These principles are based on the evaluation of the quality of the research outputs, and not the medium where they are published, and on the transparency of the data used to create “prestige” indicators. Moreover, on promoting the inclusion of a qualitative evaluation of the research work and the measurement of its social impact, fleeing from the purely quantitative indices of the publications. These principles have served as the basis and inspiration for new initiatives and projects focused on the analysis and design of new scientific assessment frameworks in a digital world.

En directo.-- Evaluación de la actividad científica: un reto del presente.

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

DORA, Evaluación cualitativa, Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable, Scientific evaluation, Declaración de San Francisco, Evaluación científica, http://metadata.un.org/sdg/4, Qualitative evaluation, http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11, Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all, San Francisco Declaration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 144
    download downloads 458
  • 144
    views
    458
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
144
458
Green