Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/313272 , 10508/1430
Se ha comparado la captación de larvas de pectínidos en dos tipos de colectores artificiales fondeados en un banco natural de Pecten jacobaeus (L., 1758) localizado entre 50 y 100 m de profundidad, al norte de la provincia de Castellón (este de España). Las mallas respectivas usadas eran de polietileno y polipropileno. Los colectores se calaron a 65 m de profundidad en abril de 2004 y se recuperaron en noviembre del mismo año. Se identificaron siete especies de pectínidos, pero la más abundante fue Aequipecten opercularis (L., 1758). En las 38 bolsas de polipropileno recuperadas se encontraron una media de 116,1 pectínidos juveniles y las 30 mallas de polietileno contenían una media de 103,7 semillas de pectínidos. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas entre los dos materiales.
Pectinid spat were settled on two kinds of artificial collectors in a natural population of Pecten jacobaeus (L., 1758) off the coast of Castellon (eastern Spain), located at depths between 50 and 100 m. The mesh used was made of polyethylene and polypropylene. Collectors were set out at a depth of 65 m in April and retrieved in November. Seven pectinid species were identified, and the most abundant species was Aequipecten opercularis (L., 1758). The 38 polypropylene bags collected had a mean of 116.1 juvenile pectinids, and the 30 polyethylene bags had a mean of 103.7 pectinid spat. The number of scallops collected on the two different plastics did not vary significantly.
Instituto Español de Oceanografía
semillas, Acuicultura, captación, vieiras, Colectores, Mediterráneo, volandeiras
semillas, Acuicultura, captación, vieiras, Colectores, Mediterráneo, volandeiras
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 24 | |
| downloads | 36 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts