Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmc: PMC8787594 , PMC8777562
handle: 10261/305558 , 20.500.12327/1646 , 20.500.12327/1653 , 10261/304849 , 11585/897108 , 11585/897107
pmc: PMC8787594 , PMC8777562
handle: 10261/305558 , 20.500.12327/1646 , 20.500.12327/1653 , 10261/304849 , 11585/897108 , 11585/897107
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period, (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones and iv) the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different clinical and laboratory sampling procedures are proposed depending on the scenarios considered. The monitoring period of 45 days was assessed as effective in affected areas where high awareness is expected, and when the index case occurs in an area where the awareness is low the monitoring period should be at least 180 days (6 months). Since transmission kernels do not exist and data to estimate transmission kernels are not available, a surveillance zone of 3 km was considered effective based on expert knowledge, while a protection zone should also be developed to include establishments adjacent to affected ones. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CCPP.
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia; Disease control measures; Mycoplasma mycoides subsp; mycoides; sampling procedures; monitoring period; protection zone; surveillance zone, surveillance zone, TP1-1185, Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia, 630, Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, 636, Sampling procedures, TX341-641, Monitoring period, Protection zone, Disease control measures, sampling procedures, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Chemical technology, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia; Disease control measures; Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae; monitoring period; protection zone; sampling procedures; surveillance zone, protection zone, Scientific Opinion, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia CCPP, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides, monitoring period, Surveillance zone
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia; Disease control measures; Mycoplasma mycoides subsp; mycoides; sampling procedures; monitoring period; protection zone; surveillance zone, surveillance zone, TP1-1185, Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia, 630, Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, 636, Sampling procedures, TX341-641, Monitoring period, Protection zone, Disease control measures, sampling procedures, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Chemical technology, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia; Disease control measures; Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae; monitoring period; protection zone; sampling procedures; surveillance zone, protection zone, Scientific Opinion, Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia CCPP, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides, monitoring period, Surveillance zone
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 80 | |
| downloads | 125 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts