Views provided by UsageCounts
ABSTRACTThe successful use of a dendrimeric peptide to protect pigs against challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), which causes the most devastating animal disease worldwide, is described. Animals were immunized intramuscularly with a peptide containing one copy of a FMDV T-cell epitope and branching out into four copies of a B-cell epitope. The four immunized pigs did not develop significant clinical signs upon FMDV challenge, neither systemic nor mucosal FMDV replication, nor was its transmission to contact control pigs observed. The dendrimeric construction specifically induced high titers of FMDV-neutralizing antibodies and activated FMDV-specific T cells. Interestingly, a potent anti-FMDV immunoglobulin A response (local and systemic) was observed, despite the parenteral administration of the peptide. On the other hand, peptide-immunized animals showed no antibodies specific of FMDV infection, which qualifies the peptide as a potential marker vaccine. Overall, the dendrimeric peptide used elicited an immune response comparable to that found for control FMDV-infected pigs that correlated with a solid protection against FMDV challenge. Dendrimeric designs of this type may hold substantial promise for peptide subunit vaccine development.
Swine Diseases, Dendrimers, Swine, T-Lymphocytes, Viral Vaccines, Antibodies, Viral, Injections, Intramuscular, Immunoglobulin A, Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus, Neutralization Tests, Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Vaccines, Subunit, Animals, Peptides
Swine Diseases, Dendrimers, Swine, T-Lymphocytes, Viral Vaccines, Antibodies, Viral, Injections, Intramuscular, Immunoglobulin A, Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus, Neutralization Tests, Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Vaccines, Subunit, Animals, Peptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 100 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 44 |

Views provided by UsageCounts