Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We analyse the evolution of the assortment of encounters through active choice of companions among individuals that interact cooperatively in a situation of mutual benefit. Using a simple mathematical model, we show that mutual benefit can favour the evolution of a preference to interact with individuals that are similar to themselves with respect to an arbitrary tag even when both the preference and the tag depend on two independent and unlinked genes. Two necessary requisites to obtain this result are: (i) a small population or a large subdivided metapulation and (ii) an asymmetry between partners in such a way that one of them (donor) proposes the cooperation and elects the partner, whereas the other (receiver) never rejects the offer. We also show that mutual benefit can be the starting point for the evolution of altruistic behaviours as long as there are preferential interactions. This requires that the tag used in the election of partners is the altruistic or selfish behaviour itself.
Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Population Dynamics, Altruism, Biological Evolution, Linkage Disequilibrium, Preferential assortment, Problems related to evolution, Gene Frequency, Mutual benefit, Sociobiology, Humans, Computer Simulation, Interpersonal Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Genetic Phenomena, Alleles
Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Population Dynamics, Altruism, Biological Evolution, Linkage Disequilibrium, Preferential assortment, Problems related to evolution, Gene Frequency, Mutual benefit, Sociobiology, Humans, Computer Simulation, Interpersonal Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Genetic Phenomena, Alleles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 47 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts