Views provided by UsageCounts
A tiered protocol for assessing ecological risks has been applied to the rice pesticide profoxydim. The initial assessment (Tier I) was based on toxicity exposure ratio (TER) calculations based on laboratory data using a worst-case rice scenario. The first refinement (Tier II) was based on direct toxicity assessment (DTA) of water samples collected during a field-mesocosm study. Finally, a higher-tier assessment on the in situ assessment of paddy community responses (field-mesocosm-Tier III) was performed. A successive application of three pesticides, the herbicides azimsulfuron, propanil and the insecticide malathion, was used as reference controls. The refined assessments indicated a lower risk than that predicted from TER estimations. DTA-based Tier II showed toxicity effects only for concentrations above the recommended dose of profoxydim. Effects for reference controls were observed in DTA which were not expected from Tier I. The field-mesocosm study confirmed these effects but also showed that they were transient and of low relevance.
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ecology, Herbicides, Reproduction, Agriculture, Oryza, Chlorella, Field-mesocosm, Risk Assessment, Zooplankton, Daphnia, Rice-field pesticides, Direct toxicity assessment, Phytoplankton, Toxicity Tests, Benzene Derivatives, Animals, Ecological risk assessment, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Pyrans
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ecology, Herbicides, Reproduction, Agriculture, Oryza, Chlorella, Field-mesocosm, Risk Assessment, Zooplankton, Daphnia, Rice-field pesticides, Direct toxicity assessment, Phytoplankton, Toxicity Tests, Benzene Derivatives, Animals, Ecological risk assessment, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Pyrans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 37 |

Views provided by UsageCounts