Views provided by UsageCounts
Abstract For neutral additive genes, the quantitative index of population divergence (QST) is equivalent to Wright’s fixation index (FST). Thus, divergent or convergent selection is usually invoked, respectively, as a cause of the observed increase (QST > FST) or decrease (QST < FST) of QST from its neutral expectation (QST = FST). However, neutral nonadditive gene action can mimic the additive expectations under selection. We have studied theoretically the effect of consecutive population bottlenecks on the difference FST - QST for two neutral biallelic epistatic loci, covering all types of marginal gene action. With simple dominance, QST < FST for only low to moderate frequencies of the recessive alleles; otherwise, QST > FST. Additional epistasis extends the condition QST < FST to a broader range of frequencies. Irrespective of the type of nonadditive action, QST < FST generally implies an increase of both the within-line additive variance after bottlenecks over its ancestral value (VA) and the between-line variance over its additive expectation (2FSTVA). Thus, both the redistribution of the genetic variance after bottlenecks and the FST - QST value are governed largely by the marginal properties of single loci. The results indicate that the use of the FST - QST criterion to investigate the relative importance of drift and selection in population differentiation should be restricted to pure additive traits.
Male, Tribolium, Models, Genetic, Genetic Drift, Genetic Variation, Epistasis, Genetic, Genes, Recessive, Models, Theoretical, Evolution, Molecular, Genetics, Population, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Gene Frequency, Genes, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Selection, Genetic, Alleles, Genes, Dominant
Male, Tribolium, Models, Genetic, Genetic Drift, Genetic Variation, Epistasis, Genetic, Genes, Recessive, Models, Theoretical, Evolution, Molecular, Genetics, Population, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Gene Frequency, Genes, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Selection, Genetic, Alleles, Genes, Dominant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 32 |

Views provided by UsageCounts