Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Geneticsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genetics
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Genetics
Article . 2004
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

The Effect of Neutral Nonadditive Gene Action on the Quantitative Index of Population Divergence

Authors: López-Fanjul, C.; Fernández, Almudena; Toro, Miguel Ángel;

The Effect of Neutral Nonadditive Gene Action on the Quantitative Index of Population Divergence

Abstract

Abstract For neutral additive genes, the quantitative index of population divergence (QST) is equivalent to Wright’s fixation index (FST). Thus, divergent or convergent selection is usually invoked, respectively, as a cause of the observed increase (QST > FST) or decrease (QST < FST) of QST from its neutral expectation (QST = FST). However, neutral nonadditive gene action can mimic the additive expectations under selection. We have studied theoretically the effect of consecutive population bottlenecks on the difference FST - QST for two neutral biallelic epistatic loci, covering all types of marginal gene action. With simple dominance, QST < FST for only low to moderate frequencies of the recessive alleles; otherwise, QST > FST. Additional epistasis extends the condition QST < FST to a broader range of frequencies. Irrespective of the type of nonadditive action, QST < FST generally implies an increase of both the within-line additive variance after bottlenecks over its ancestral value (VA) and the between-line variance over its additive expectation (2FSTVA). Thus, both the redistribution of the genetic variance after bottlenecks and the FST - QST value are governed largely by the marginal properties of single loci. The results indicate that the use of the FST - QST criterion to investigate the relative importance of drift and selection in population differentiation should be restricted to pure additive traits.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Tribolium, Models, Genetic, Genetic Drift, Genetic Variation, Epistasis, Genetic, Genes, Recessive, Models, Theoretical, Evolution, Molecular, Genetics, Population, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Gene Frequency, Genes, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Selection, Genetic, Alleles, Genes, Dominant

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    74
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 32
  • 32
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
74
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
32
Green
hybrid